Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277565›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

A Framework for the Implementation of Digital Mental Health Interventions: The Importance of Feasibility and Acceptability Research.

Susanna Y Park, Chloe Nicksic Sigmon, Debra Boeldt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06122688 (By Youth, For Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06122688 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

By Youth, For Youth: Digital Supported Peer Navigation for Addressing Child Mental Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, RiversideRan2026 to 2029Enrolled8,360ConditionsAnxiety, Depression, Mental Health IssueArmsNavigator Plus App Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susanna Y ParkNational Mental Health Innovation Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.
Chloe Nicksic SigmonNational Mental Health Innovation Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.
Debra BoeldtNational Mental Health Innovation Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have the potential to serve a significantly wider portion of the population in need of mental health services. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has especially highlighted the exacerbation of mental health disparities among minoritized populations. Innovations and research on DMHIs continue to expand, reinforcing the need for a more systemic process of DMHI implementation. In practice, DMHI implementation often skips the fundamental steps of conducting acceptability and feasibility studies. We propose a DMHI implementation framework that identifies an acceptability and feasibility study as an essential first step, simultaneously centering equitable processes that address populations disproportionately affected by mental illness.

Indexed as

acceptabilitydigital mental healthfeasibilityimplementationmental healthmental health technology

Identifiers

PMID36277565
PMCPMC9580609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.