Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277477›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022

Modeling intracranial electrodes. A simulation platform for the evaluation of localization algorithms.

Alejandro O Blenkmann, Anne-Kristin Solbakk, Jugoslav Ivanovic, Pål Gunnar Larsson, Robert T Knight, Tor Endestad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandro O BlenkmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne-Kristin SolbakkDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jugoslav IvanovicDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Pål Gunnar LarssonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Robert T KnightDepartment of Psychology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Tor EndestadDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Helgeland Museum · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Neural circuit theory and trained recurrent network modeling of rapid learningU19NS107609 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUFFALO, ELIZABETH A · 2018 to 2022
$12.6M
Attention, Orientation and the Human Prefrontal CortexR01NS021135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 1985 to 2026
$6.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS021135NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Intracranial electrodes are implanted in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy as part of their pre-surgical evaluation. This allows the investigation of normal and pathological brain functions with excellent spatial and temporal resolution. The spatial resolution relies on methods that precisely localize the implanted electrodes in the cerebral cortex, which is critical for drawing valid inferences about the anatomical localization of brain function. Multiple methods have been developed to localize the electrodes, mainly relying on pre-implantation MRI and post-implantation computer tomography (CT) images. However, they are hard to validate because there is no ground truth data to test them and there is no standard approach to systematically quantify their performance. In other words, their validation lacks standardization. Our work aimed to model intracranial electrode arrays and simulate realistic implantation scenarios, thereby providing localization algorithms with new ways to evaluate and optimize their performance. Results: We implemented novel methods to model the coordinates of implanted grids, strips, and depth electrodes, as well as the CT artifacts produced by these. We successfully modeled realistic implantation scenarios, including different sizes, inter-electrode distances, and brain areas. In total, ∼3,300 grids and strips were fitted over the brain surface, and ∼850 depth electrode arrays penetrating the cortical tissue were modeled. Realistic CT artifacts were simulated at the electrode locations under 12 different noise levels. Altogether, ∼50,000 thresholded CT artifact arrays were simulated in these scenarios, and validated with real data from 17 patients regarding the coordinates' spatial deformation, and the CT artifacts' shape, intensity distribution, and noise level. Finally, we provide an example of how the simulation platform is used to characterize the performance of two cluster-based localization methods. Conclusion: We successfully developed the first platform to model implanted intracranial grids, strips, and depth electrodes and realistically simulate thresholded CT artifacts and their noise. These methods provide a basis for developing more complex models, while simulations allow systematic evaluation of the performance of electrode localization techniques. The methods described in this article, and the results obtained from the simulations, are freely available via open repositories. A graphical user interface implementation is also accessible via the open-source iElectrodes toolbox.

Indexed as

depth electrodesECoGiEEGintracranial electrodesSEEGsubcortical gridssubdural grids

Identifiers

PMID36277477
PMCPMC9582989
OpenAlexW4302287382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.