Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277453›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2021

Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions.

Glenn P Boyles, Ashlee M Weaver, David E Cohn, Floor J Backes, Larry J Copeland, Kristin L Bixel, Jeffrey M Fowler, David M O'Malley, Casey M Cosgrove

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Glenn P BoylesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (Dr Boyles).
Ashlee M WeaverThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (Dr Weaver).
David E CohnDivision of Gynecologic Oncology.
Floor J BackesDivision of Gynecologic Oncology.
Larry J CopelandDivision of Gynecologic Oncology.
Kristin L BixelDivision of Gynecologic Oncology.
Jeffrey M FowlerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology.
David M O'MalleyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology.
Casey M CosgroveDivision of Gynecologic Oncology.
Gynecologic Oncology Group · USThe Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research.

objectiveThis study aimed to estimate the rate of wound complications following simple vulvar excision and to identify the risk factors for these outcomes. Our secondary objectives were to determine the rates of (1) positive margins and (2) occult carcinoma in the cases of vulvar dysplasia. STUDY

designWe conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent simple vulvar excision procedures for suspected premalignant or benign lesions between June 2016 and February 2020. Our primary outcome was the rate of composite wound complications, including wound separation or breakdown, infection, or hematoma. Our secondary outcomes were the incidence of (1) margins positive for residual dysplasia and (2) occult minimally invasive carcinoma. The Fisher exact tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the categorical variables and logistic regression models and independent student

resultsOf the 338 patients included in the study, 143 (42.3%) experienced wound complication. Most of these complications were wound separation or breakdown (n=134, 39.6%), followed by infection (n=22, 6.5%), and hematoma (n=4, 1.2%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of high-grade vulvar dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.15), longer specimen diameter (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.05), and lesion location on the perineum (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-3.66) were independent risk factors. With high-grade vulvar dysplasia, the rate of positive margins was 50.2% (114/227) and that of occult microinvasive carcinoma was 17.2% (39/227). Notably, the primary and secondary outcomes were similar among gynecologic oncologists and gynecologists.

conclusionWound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions are common. Select groups may benefit from anticipatory counseling and future interventional studies to prevent complication. The incidence of positive surgical margins and occult minimally invasive carcinoma is also high, reflecting the challenging nature of treating vulvar disease.

Indexed as

gynecologic surgical proceduresmarginspostoperative complicationrisk factorssimple partial vulvectomyvulvar carcinomavulvar dysplasiavulvar surgerywide local excision

Identifiers

PMID36277453
PMCPMC9563940
OpenAlexW3204283396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.