Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277406›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Cell-cell interactions and fluctuations in the direction of motility promote directed migration of osteoblasts in direct current electrotaxis.

Jonathan Edward Dawson, Tina Sellmann, Katrin Porath, Rainer Bader, Ursula van Rienen, Revathi Appali, Rüdiger Köhling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan Edward DawsonInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Tina SellmannOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Katrin PorathOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Rainer BaderDepartment of Life, Light and Matter, Interdisciplinary Faculty, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Ursula van RienenInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Revathi AppaliInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Rüdiger KöhlingOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DEAugusta University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under both physiological (development, regeneration) and pathological conditions (cancer metastasis), cells migrate while sensing environmental cues in the form of mechanical, chemical or electrical stimuli. In the case of bone tissue, osteoblast migration is essential in bone regeneration. Although it is known that osteoblasts respond to exogenous electric fields, the underlying mechanism of electrotactic collective movement of human osteoblasts is unclear. Here, we present a computational model that describes the osteoblast cell migration in a direct current electric field as the motion of a collection of active self-propelled particles and takes into account fluctuations in the direction of single-cell migration, finite-range cell-cell interactions, and the interaction of a cell with the external electric field. By comparing this model with

Indexed as

cell migrationcollective migrationcomputational modelingelectrotaxisosteoblastsparticle based approach

Identifiers

PMID36277406
PMCPMC9582662
OpenAlexW4302304982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.