ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Cybergenetic control of microbial community composition.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden-aware feedback control of microbial consortia.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Characterization of Synthetic Gene Circuits with Absolute Quantification in Continuous Culture.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Dynamic Robust Control of Microbial Communities Using Cybergenetics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Directing microbial co-culture composition using cybernetic control.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Sugar transport in thermophiles: Bridging lignocellulose deconstruction and bioconversion.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of bacterial communities in bioproduction instead of monocultures has potential advantages including increased productivity through division of labour, ability to utilise cheaper substrates, and robustness against perturbations. A key challenge in the application of engineered bacterial communities is the ability to reliably control the composition of the community in terms of its constituent species. This is crucial to prevent faster growing species from outcompeting others with a lower relative fitness, and to ensure that all species are present at an optimal ratio during different steps in a biotechnological process. In contrast to purely biological approaches such as synthetic quorum sensing circuits or paired auxotrophies, cybergenetic control techniques - those in which computers interface with living cells-are emerging as an alternative approach with many advantages. The community composition is measured through methods such as fluorescence intensity or flow cytometry, with measured data fed real-time into a computer. A control action is computed using a variety of possible control algorithms and then applied to the system, with actuation taking the form of chemical (e.g., inducers, nutrients) or physical (e.g., optogenetic, mechanical) inputs. Subsequent changes in composition are then measured and the cycle repeated, maintaining or driving the system to a desired state. This review discusses recent and future developments in methods for implementing cybergenetic control systems, contrasts their capabilities with those of traditional biological methods of population control, and discusses future directions and outstanding challenges for the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.