ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Function-based classification of hazardous biological sequences: Demonstration of a new paradigm for biohazard assessments.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discerning dangerous gain of function: most gain of function (GoF) research does not involve infectious microbes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- The limits of sequence-based biosecurity screening tools in the age of AI-assisted protein design.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Beyond sequence similarity: toward function-based screening of nucleic acid synthesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- ADAPT: a programme for the advanced detection of AI-enabled pathogenic threats.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- A perspective and demonstration of an approach to screening synthetic nucleic acid orders containing short nucleic acid sequences.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Case for Limiting "Sequences of Concern" to Those with Demonstrated Pathogenic Function.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2025Article
- New and revised gene ontology biological process terms describe multiorganism interactions critical for understanding microbial pathogenesis and sequences of concern.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- Progress and Prospects for a Nucleic Acid Screening Test Set.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2024Article
- Annotation of Functions of Sequences of Concern and Its Relevance to the New Biosecurity Regulatory Framework in the United States.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2024Article
- A Sensitivity Study for Interpreting Nucleic Acid Sequence Screening Regulatory and Guidance Documentation: Toward a Foundational Synthetic Nucleic Acid Sequence Screening Framework.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2024Article
- UltraSEQ, a Universal Bioinformatic Platform for Information-Based Clinical Metagenomics and Beyond.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioengineering applies analytical and engineering principles to identify functional biological building blocks for biotechnology applications. While these building blocks are leveraged to improve the human condition, the lack of simplistic, machine-readable definition of biohazards at the function level is creating a gap for biosafety practices. More specifically, traditional safety practices focus on the biohazards of known pathogens at the organism-level and may not accurately consider novel biodesigns with engineered functionalities at the genetic component-level. This gap is motivating the need for a paradigm shift from organism-centric procedures to function-centric biohazard identification and classification practices. To address this challenge, we present a novel methodology for classifying biohazards at the individual sequence level, which we then compiled to distinguish the biohazardous property of pathogenicity at the whole genome level. Our methodology is rooted in compilation of hazardous functions, defined as a set of sequences and associated metadata that describe coarse-level functions associated with pathogens (e.g., adherence, immune subversion). We demonstrate that the resulting database can be used to develop hazardous "fingerprints" based on the functional metadata categories. We verified that these hazardous functions are found at higher levels in pathogens compared to non-pathogens, and hierarchical clustering of the fingerprints can distinguish between these two groups. The methodology presented here defines the hazardous functions associated with bioengineering functional building blocks at the sequence level, which provide a foundational framework for classifying biological hazards at the organism level, thus leading to the improvement and standardization of current biosecurity and biosafety practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.