Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277388›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Viscoelastic damage evaluation of the axon.

Fuad Hasan, Kah Al Mahmud, Md Ishak Khan, Ashfaq Adnan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fuad HasanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
Kah Al MahmudDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
Md Ishak KhanPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Ashfaq AdnanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
The University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this manuscript, we have studied the microstructure of the axonal cytoskeleton and adopted a bottom-up approach to evaluate the mechanical responses of axons. The cytoskeleton of the axon includes the microtubules (MT), Tau proteins (Tau), neurofilaments (NF), and microfilaments (MF). Although most of the rigidity of the axons is due to the MT, the viscoelastic response of axons comes from the Tau. Early studies have shown that NF and MF do not provide significant elasticity to the overall response of axons. Therefore, the most critical aspect of the mechanical response of axons is the microstructural topology of how MT and Tau are connected and construct the cross-linked network. Using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), the cross-sectional view of the axons revealed that the MTs are organized in a hexagonal array and cross-linked by Tau. Therefore, we have developed a hexagonal Representative Volume Element (RVE) of the axonal microstructure with MT and Tau as fibers. The matrix of the RVE is modeled by considering a combined effect of NF and MF. A parametric study is done by varying fiber geometric and mechanical properties. The Young's modulus and spacing of MT are varied between 1.5 and 1.9 GPa and 20-38 nm, respectively. Tau is modeled as a 3-parameter General Maxwell viscoelastic material. The failure strains for MT and Tau are taken to be 50 and 40%, respectively. A total of 4 RVEs are prepared for finite element analysis, and six loading cases are inspected to quantify the three-dimensional (3D) viscoelastic relaxation response. The volume-averaged stress and strain are then used to fit the relaxation Prony series. Next, we imposed varying strain rates (between 10/sec to 50/sec) on the RVE and analyzed the axonal failure process. We have observed that the 40% failure strain of Tau is achieved in all strain rates before the MT reaches its failure strain of 50%. The corresponding axonal failure strain and stress vary between 6 and 11% and 5-19.8 MPa, respectively. This study can be used to model macroscale axonal aggregate typical of the white matter region of the brain tissue.

Indexed as

composite materialscytoskeletonfinite element analysismechanical behavior of axonmechanical characterizationneuronrepresentative volume element (RVE)traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36277388
PMCPMC9583024
OpenAlexW4302304947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.