ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoparticle-based therapeutic platforms for inflammatory disorders of the urinary system: Engineering local delivery, biointerface regulation, and smart responsive therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Nanoreagents Against the Blood-Testis Barrier: A Strategy for Diagnosing and Treating Male Reproductive System Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Fabrication and application of targeted ciprofloxacin nanocarriers for the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2024Article
- Thermosensitive hydrogel with emodin-loaded triple-targeted nanoparticles for a rectal drug delivery system in the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- A combined electrohydrodynamic atomization method for preparing nanofiber/microparticle hybrid medicines.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic bacterial prostatitis usually occurs in men and seriously affects the quality of life of patients. The efficacy of chronic bacterial prostatitis treatment is limited by the difficulty for free drugs (e.g., antibiotics) to penetrate the prostate epithelium and target inflammatory tissues. The advent of nanotechnology offers the possibility to address this issue, such as the development of targeted nanoparticle delivery strategies that may overcome these important limitations. The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles, such as particle size, shape and surface modification ligands, determine their targeting effectiveness. In this study, nanoparticles with different physicochemical properties were prepared to explore and confirm their targeting capacities to inflammatory prostate tissues of chronic bacterial prostatitis, focusing on the effects of size and different modification ligands on the targeting performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.