Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277359›Full record

ArticleToxicological research2022

Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified

Jung-Ah Seo, Sun-A Cho, Chang Eon Park, Dong Hyuk Seo, Myungsuk Choi, Susun An, Bae-Hwan Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jung-Ah SeoDepartment of Public Health, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu, 42601 Republic of Korea.
Sun-A ChoSafety and Microbiology Lab, Amorepacific Corporation R&D Center, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.
Chang Eon ParkKorea Testing and Research Institute, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hyuk SeoKorea Conformity Laboratories, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Myungsuk ChoiDepartment of Public Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Susun AnSafety and Microbiology Lab, Amorepacific Corporation R&D Center, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.
Bae-Hwan KimDepartment of Public Health, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu, 42601 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5898-0748
Amorepacific (South Korea) · KRKeimyung University · KRKorea Testing Laboratory · KRKorea Testing & Research Institute · KRKorea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA.

Indexed as

DPRAIn chemicoPre-validationSkin sensitizationSpectro-DPRA

Identifiers

PMID36277359
PMCPMC9532475
OpenAlexW4281626071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.