Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277257›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2022

The Acceptability of Remotely Delivered Cognitive Adaptation Training.

Feiyu Li, Jim Mintz, Veronica Sebastian, Chenyi Wang, Cory Kennedy, Shail Vyas, Dawn I Velligan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Feiyu LiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jim MintzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Veronica SebastianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Chenyi WangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Cory KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Shail VyasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Dawn I VelliganDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

Remote Cognitive Adaptation Training to improve medication follow through in managed care (R-CAT)R56MH123797 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI VELLIGAN, DAWN IRENE · 2020 to 2020
$767k
NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH123797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is a psychosocial treatment using environmental supports such as signs, checklists, technology, and the organization of belongings to bypass cognitive and motivational impairments for those with serious behavioral health problems. We conducted a survey of 204 members of managed Medicaid in Texas to examine the acceptability of, opinions about and preferences for CAT delivered in-person (CAT) or remotely (R-CAT) where supplies would be mailed and visits would occur via videoconferencing. The telephone survey presented descriptions of CAT and R-CAT in counterbalanced order eliciting general opinions about the treatments, such as (1) whether they would accept the treatments if they were offered the day of the survey at no cost, (2) which treatment was preferred, and (3) the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with a number of statements about components of the treatments. Results indicated that both R-CAT and CAT were acceptable to respondents with overall acceptance rates significantly higher for R-CAT 87% than for CAT (78%). With respect to preferences, 27% and 28% of respondents preferred CAT and R-CAT, respectively, and 41% of respondents preferred both equally. Black respondents more often preferred in-person CAT to other alternatives. Respondents agreed that they needed help, that they were comfortable with technology, and that they believed the programs would help them. The vast majority of qualitative comments about the treatments were positive. Results suggest that it will be important to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of CAT delivered remotely in randomized trials.

Indexed as

compensatory strategiesmedication adherencemeidicaidserious mental illnesstelehealthtreatment preference

Identifiers

PMID36277257
PMCPMC9569425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.