Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277249›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2022

The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Infectious Diseases.

Hongzhi Lu, Li Ma, Hong Zhang, Li Feng, Ying Yu, Yihan Zhao, Li Li, Yujiao Zhou, Li Song, Wushuang Li and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring drug resistance genes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongzhi LuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
Li MaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
Li FengDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
Ying YuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
Yihan ZhaoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
Li LiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
Yujiao ZhouDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
Li SongShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201204, People's Republic of China.
Wushuang LiShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201204, People's Republic of China.
Jiangman ZhaoShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201204, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6572-6177
Lanxiang LiuMedical Imaging Center, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000, People's Republic of China.
First Hospital of Qinhuangdao · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been widely studied, due to its ability of detecting all the microbial genetic information unbiasedly in a sample at one time and not relying on traditional culture. However, the application of mNGS in the diagnosis of clinical pathogens remains challenging. Methods: From December 2019 to March 2021, 134 specimens including Broncho alveolar lavage fluid (BAFL), blood, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), bile, pleural fluid, pus, were continuously collected in The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, and their retrospective diagnoses were classified into infectious disease (128, 95.5%) and noninfectious disease (6, 4.5%). The pathogen-detection performance of mNGS was compared with conventional microbiological tests (CMT) and culture method. In addition, the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and evolutionary relationship of common drug-resistant Results: Compared with CMT and culture methods, mNGS showed higher sensitivity in pathogen detection (74.2% vs 57.8%; P < 0.001 and 66.3% vs 31.7%; P < 0.001, respectively). Importantly, for cases that mNGS-positive only, 18 (35%) cases result in diagnosis modification, and 7 (23%) cases confirmed the clinical diagnosis. In 17 cases that Conclusion: In our study, mNGS had a higher sensitivity than CMT and culture method. And the result of ARGs frequency and cluster analysis of

Indexed as

antibiotic resistance genesconventional microbiological testsinfectionmetagenomic next-generation sequencingsensitivity

Identifiers

PMID36277249
PMCPMC9586124
OpenAlexW4306990836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.