ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022
Clinical and radiomic factors for predicting invasiveness in pulmonary ground‑glass opacity.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Malignancy in Ground-Glass Opacity Using Multivariate Regression and Deep Learning Models: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Radiomics of Vascular Structures in Pulmonary Ground-glass Nodules: A Predictor of InvasivenessCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Peritumoral Adipose Tissue Features Derived from [Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with preinvasive or invasive pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO) often face different clinical treatments and prognoses. The present study aimed to identify the invasiveness of pulmonary GGO by analysing clinical and radiomic features. Patients with pulmonary GGOs who were treated between January 2014 and February 2019 were included. Clinical features were collected, while radiomic features were extracted from computed tomography records using the three-dimensional Slicer software. Predictors of GGO invasiveness were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn for each prediction model. A total of 194 patients with pulmonary GGOs were included in the present study. The maximum diameter of the solid component, waveletHLL_ngtdm_Coarseness (P=0.03), waveletLHH_firstorder_Maximum (P<0.01) and waveletLLH_glrlm_LongRunEmphasis (P<0.01) were significant predictors of invasive lung GGOs. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the prediction models of clinical features and radiomic features was 0.755 and 0.719, respectively, whereas the AUC for the combined prediction model was 0.864 (95% CI, 0.802-0.926). Finally, a nomogram was established for individualized prediction of invasiveness. The combination of radiomic and clinical features can enable the differentiation between preinvasive and invasive GGOs. The present results can provide some basis for the best choice of treatment in patients with lung GGOs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.