Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277108›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Illinois medical professionals related to ticks and tick-borne disease.

Dawn A Carson, Heather Kopsco, Peg Gronemeyer, Nohra Mateus-Pinilla, Genee S Smith, Emma N Sandstrom, Rebecca L Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dawn A CarsonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States of America.
Heather KopscoDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States of America.
Peg GronemeyerIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States of America.
Nohra Mateus-PinillaIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States of America.
Genee S SmithDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States of America.
Emma N SandstromDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States of America.
Rebecca L SmithDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States of America.

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rising incidence of tick-borne disease (TBD) underscores the importance of proficiency in TBD diagnosis. Clinicians' knowledge about vector ticks and TBDs in their area may influence whether patients are questioned about potential tick exposure and the consideration of diagnostic testing for TBDs. Objective: Our objective was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Illinois clinicians towards ticks and TBDs. The study aimed to 1) identify predictors associated with knowledge, 2) identify knowledge gaps, and 3) evaluate attitudes and practices related to TBDs. Methods: A web-based knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey about Illinois ticks and TBDs was disseminated to physicians, mid-level practitioners, and nurses between August 2020 and February 2022. Poisson regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of higher scores. Results: Of 346 respondents, 80% correctly identified Lyme disease as endemic to Illinois, and 95% were familiar with diagnostic testing for Lyme. Knowledge of other TBDs present in the state was highest among physicians, yet only 26% of physicians believed Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) to be present in Illinois, and only 17% believed ehrlichiosis to be endemic. Only 32% of physicians knew the cause of Alpha-gal syndrome and fewer than 18% were aware of available diagnostic testing. Tick or TBD-related education within the past two years was the most significant predictor of higher scores, increasing overall knowledge scores by 26% (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.41) and increasing scores specific to TBDs by 42% (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.69). Conclusion: Illinois clinicians were informed about Lyme disease but lacked knowledge of other TBDs endemic to the state, including RMSF, ehrlichiosis, and Alpha-gal syndrome. The strongest predictor of knowledge was tick/TBD training in the previous two years, highlighting the importance of frequent region-specific training on ticks and TBDs.

Indexed as

A-galEhrlichiosisKAP, Knowledge, attitudes, and practicesLyme diseaseRMSF, Rocky Mountain spotted feverRocky mountain spotted feverSFGR, Spotted fever group rickettsiosisTBD, Tick-borne diseaseTick-borne diseaseTicks

Identifiers

PMID36277108
PMCPMC9582564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.