Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277103›Full record

ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

What is a biosecurity measure? A definition proposal for animal production and linked processing operations.

Nikolaus Huber, Mathieu Andraud, Elena L Sassu, Christopher Prigge, Veit Zoche-Golob, Annemarie Käsbohrer, Daniela D'Angelantonio, Arvo Viltrop, Jacek Żmudzki, Hannah Jones and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Biosecurity measures reducingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nikolaus HuberFarm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine (Vetmeduni), Vienna, Austria.
Mathieu AndraudPloufragan-Plouzané Laboratory, Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES), France.
Elena L SassuDivision for Animal Health, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Austria.
Christopher PriggeDivision for Animal Health, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Austria.
Veit Zoche-GolobDepartment of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Annemarie KäsbohrerFarm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine (Vetmeduni), Vienna, Austria.
Daniela D'AngelantonioIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale (IZSAM), Italy.
Arvo ViltropInstitute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia.
Jacek ŻmudzkiDepartment of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Poland.
Hannah JonesAnimal and Plant Health Agency, United Kingdom.
Richard P SmithAnimal and Plant Health Agency, United Kingdom.
Tijs TobiasDepartment Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Elke BurowDepartment of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While biosecurity, a central component of the One Health concept, is clearly defined, a harmonized definition of the term ´biosecurity measure´ (BSM) is missing. In turn, particularly at the farm and policy level, this leads to misunderstandings, low acceptance, poor implementation, and thus suboptimal biosecurity along the food animal production chain. Moreover, different views on BSMs affects making comparisons both at the policy level as well as in the scientific community. Therefore, as part of the One Health EJP BIOPIGEE project, a work group i) collected and discussed relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria for measures to be considered in the context of biosecurity and ii) conducted a systematic literature review for potentially existing definitions for the term BSM. This exercise confirmed the lack of a definition of BSM, underlining the importance of the topic. In the pool of articles considered relevant to defining the term BSM, specific research themes were identified. Based on these outcomes, we propose a definition of the term BSM: "A biosecurity measure (BSM) - is the implementation of a segregation, hygiene, or management procedure (excluding medically effective feed additives and preventive/curative treatment of animals) that specifically aims at reducing the probability of the introduction, establishment, survival, or spread of any potential pathogen to, within, or from a farm, operation or geographical area." The definition provides a basis for policymakers to identify factual BSMs, highlights the point of implementation and supports to achieve the necessary quality standards of biosecurity in food animal production. It also enables clear, harmonized, cross-sectoral communication of best biosecurity practices to and from relevant stakeholders and thus contribute to improving biosecurity and thereby strengthen the One Health approach.

Indexed as

BiosecurityLivestockOne healthSwineZoonotic disease prevention

Identifiers

PMID36277103
PMCPMC9582555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.