Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277101›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

One Health gains momentum in Africa but room exists for improvement.

Folorunso O Fasina, Bernard Bett, Michel Dione, Florence Mutua, Kristina Roesel, Lian Thomas, Emmah Kwoba, Chrisistom Ayebazibwe, Nebart Mtika, Daniel T Gebeyehu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Folorunso O FasinaEmergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Nairobi, Kenya.
Bernard BettInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Michel DioneInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Florence MutuaInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kristina RoeselInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lian ThomasInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emmah KwobaInternational Training and Education Centre for Health (I-TECH-Kenya)-University of Washington, Kenya.
Chrisistom AyebazibweEmergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Kampala, Uganda.
Nebart MtikaYouth Leadership Development on Conservation, Nature Kit, Kasungu, Malawi.
Daniel T GebeyehuDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Wollo University, Dessie 1145, Ethiopia.
Niwael Mtui-MalamshaEmergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Maganga SamboDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Tanzania.
Emmanuel S SwaiDirectorate of Veterinary Services, Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Charles BebayEmergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The degree of One-Healthiness of a system relates to the effectiveness of an institution to operate within the six main dimensions which identify to what extent it complies with One Health concept. This paper evaluates institutional compliance with One Health concept in 14 institutions from eight African countries. Methods: We utilised the adapted Network for the Evaluation of One Health (NEOH) tool. The institutions included six national One Health platforms and eight other institutions utilizing One Health approaches. Semi-quantitative evaluation of One Health platforms' competencies in six aspects/dimensions concerning One Health operations and infrastructure: Results: The evaluation revealed that although all aspects of One Health scored above average, systemic organization and working in One Health were the strongest areas where tremendous gains had been made across the evaluated countries. The aspects of planning, sharing, learning, and thinking should be optimized to achieve gains emanating from One Health approaches in Africa. Cultural and social balance, and integrated health approach were the strongest areas under working and thinking respectively. Thinking was particularly challenged in areas of dimensions coverage and balance, while planning was challenged in the areas of capacity for detection, identification, monitoring of infectious diseases; biosafety and quality management; skills through taught and distance-learning programmes; information and communication technologies to support learning and skills through research apprenticeships. Conclusion: We conclude that although One Health has gained momentum in Africa, there still exists room for improvement. The revealed strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and gaps in One Health implementation provide an opportunity for prioritization and refocusing of efforts and resources to strengthen the identified weak areas.

Indexed as

FunctionalityIntegrated approaches to healthNational One Health PlatformOne Health evaluationOne Health indexOne Health ratioTransdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID36277101
PMCPMC9582571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.