Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277097›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Antibiotics usage practices in aquaculture in Bangladesh and their associated factors.

Sukanta Chowdhury, Shafiq Rheman, Nitish Debnath, Jerome Delamare-Deboutteville, Zubair Akhtar, Sumon Ghosh, Shahana Parveen, Khaleda Islam, Md Ariful Islam, Md Mahbubur Rashid and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sukanta ChowdhuryInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b).
Shafiq RhemanWorldFish, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nitish DebnathFleming Fund Country Grant to Bangladesh, DAI Global, LLC, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jerome Delamare-DebouttevilleWorldFish, Penang, Malaysia.
Zubair AkhtarInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b).
Sumon GhoshInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b).
Shahana ParveenInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b).
Khaleda IslamFleming Fund Country Grant to Bangladesh, DAI Global, LLC, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Ariful IslamInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b).
Md Mahbubur RashidInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b).
Zobaidul Haque KhanFleming Fund Country Grant to Bangladesh, DAI Global, LLC, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mahmudur RahmanGlobal Health Development, EMPHNET, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Vishnumurthy Mohan ChadagWorldFish, Penang, Malaysia.
Fahmida ChowdhuryInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Irrational and inappropriate use of antibiotics in aquaculture can contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. Objectives: In this study, we aimed to assess antibiotic usage in inland and coastal fish farms in Bangladesh and identify factors associated with this practice. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study to collect antibiotic usage information from 672 fish farmers in Bangladesh. The frequency of use, the types of antibiotics, the purpose of usage, and antibiotic prescribing practices were estimated. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated to measure the association between antibiotic usage and factors related to the characteristics of the farms and farmers using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Twenty-two farms reported using antibiotics in the last 24 h preceding the interview (3%, 95% CI: 2-5%); 36 farms (5%, 95% CI: 4-7%) in the last 72 h, 141 farms (21%, 95% CI: 18-24%) in the last 14 days, and 478 farms (71%, 68-75%) reported antibiotic usage at least once since the start of their production cycle. Antibiotics usage in the last 14 days preceding the interviews was higher in freshwater fish farms (98%) than in brackish water farms (2%). Oxytetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and amoxicillin were the most frequently used antibiotics. Most of the antibiotics were reported to be used for both therapeutic and prophylactic purposes (71%, 95% CI: 63-78%). Antibiotics used within the last 14 days were mainly advised by feed dealers or drug sellers (51%, 95% CI: 43-60%), followed by farmers themselves (31%, 95% CI: 23-38%) and local service providers (18%, 95% CI, 12-25%). Fish farms having history of antibiotic use within the last 14 days preceding interviews was significantly associated with illness in fish (aOR 1.98, 95% CI:1.21-3.29) compared to farms with healthy fish and fishes cultured in ponds (aOR 9.34, 95% CI: 3.69-23.62) compared to enclosure cultures. Conclusions: Improvement of fish health through better farming practices and changes in feed dealers' and farmers' attitudes towards self-prescription of antibiotic without veterinarian diagnostics may help to reduce the levels of antibiotic usage and thus contribute to mitigating antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Antibiotic usageAquacultureBangladesh

Identifiers

PMID36277097
PMCPMC9582543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.