ReviewPlant and soil2022
Experimental and conceptual approaches to root water transport.
Review in Plant and soil, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying Root Turgor Using Dew Point Hygrometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Root anatomical gradients and cultivar differences underlie variation in root hydraulic properties in German winter wheat.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Reverse Sap Flow from Fruit.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Let's Get Real: Are Wearable Plant Sensors Ready for Crop Monitoring?ACS sensors · 2025Review
- Field plants strategically regulate water uptake from different soil depths by spatiotemporally adjusting their radial root hydraulic conductivity.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Decreased root hydraulic traits in German winter wheat cultivars over 100 years of breeding.Plant physiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Primary, seminal and lateral roots of maize show type-specific growth and hydraulic responses to water deficit.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- Special Issue "Phytohormones: Important Participators in Plant Growth and Development".International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- A root functional-structural model allows assessment of the effects of water deficit on water and solute transport parameters.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Effects of aMembranes · 2023Article
- The flow of water: Critical factors of root axial water transport determined.Plant physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Root water transport, which critically contributes to the plant water status and thereby plant productivity, has been the object of extensive experimental and theoretical studies. However, root systems represent an intricate assembly of cells in complex architectures, including many tissues at distinct developmental stages. Our comprehension of where and how molecular actors integrate their function in order to provide the root with its hydraulic properties is therefore still limited. Scope: Based on current literature and prospective discussions, this review addresses how root water transport can be experimentally measured, what is known about the underlying molecular actors, and how elementary water transport processes are scaled up in numerical/mathematical models. Conclusions: The theoretical framework and experimental procedures on root water transport that are in use today have been established a few decades ago. However, recent years have seen the appearance of new techniques and models with enhanced resolution, down to a portion of root or to the tissue level. These advances pave the way for a better comprehension of the dynamics of water uptake by roots in the soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.