Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277057›Full record

ReviewBiological invasions2022

Identifying, reducing, and communicating uncertainty in community science: a focus on alien species.

Anna F Probert, Daniel Wegmann, Lara Volery, Tim Adriaens, Rigers Bakiu, Sandro Bertolino, Franz Essl, Eugenio Gervasini, Quentin Groom, Guillaume Latombe and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological invasions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.

Anna F ProbertDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 15, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4288-4716
Daniel WegmannDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 15, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2866-6739
Lara VoleryDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 15, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-4119
Tim AdriaensResearch Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Herman Teirlinckgebouw, Havenlaan 88 bus 73, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7268-4200
Rigers BakiuFaculty of Agriculture and Environment, Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries, Agricultural University of Tirana, Koder-Kamez, Tirane, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-9613-4606
Sandro BertolinoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1063-8281
Franz EsslGlobal Change, Macroecology-Group, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-2112
Eugenio GervasiniJoint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.
Quentin GroomMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0596-5376
Guillaume LatombeGlobal Change, Macroecology-Group, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8589-8387
Dragana MarisavljevicInstitute for Plant Protection and Environment, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-1123-2427
John MumfordCentre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, SL5 7PY UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8964-1784
Jan PerglInstitute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-1974
Cristina PredaOvidius University of Constanta, Al. Universitatii nr.1, Corp B, 900470 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3513-7344
Helen E RoyUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, OX10 8BB UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6050-679X
Riccardo ScaleraIUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4100-3959
Heliana TeixeiraCESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8525-9967
Elena TricaricoDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, FI Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7392-0794
Sonia VanderhoevenBelgian Biodiversity Platform - Département du Milieu Naturel et Agricole - Service Public de Wallonie, Avenue Maréchal Juin 23, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6298-5373
Sven BacherDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 15, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5147-7165
University of Fribourg · CHUniversity of Vienna · ATAgricultural University of Tirana · ALCzech Academy of Sciences · CZImperial College London · GBInstitute for Plant Protection and Environment · RSInteruniversity Consortium for Magnetic Resonance · ITJoint Research Centre · ITMeise Botanic Garden · BEOvidius University · ROResearch Institute for Nature and Forest · BEService Public de Wallonie · BEUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBUniversity of Aveiro · PTUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community science (also often referred to as citizen science) provides a unique opportunity to address questions beyond the scope of other research methods whilst simultaneously engaging communities in the scientific process. This leads to broad educational benefits, empowers people, and can increase public awareness of societally relevant issues such as the biodiversity crisis. As such, community science has become a favourable framework for researching alien species where data on the presence, absence, abundance, phenology, and impact of species is important in informing management decisions. However, uncertainties arising at different stages can limit the interpretation of data and lead to projects failing to achieve their intended outcomes. Focusing on alien species centered community science projects, we identified key research questions and the relevant uncertainties that arise during the process of developing the study design, for example, when collecting the data and during the statistical analyses. Additionally, we assessed uncertainties from a linguistic perspective, and how the communication stages among project coordinators, participants and other stakeholders can alter the way in which information may be interpreted. We discuss existing methods for reducing uncertainty and suggest further solutions to improve data reliability. Further, we make suggestions to reduce the uncertainties that emerge at each project step and provide guidance and recommendations that can be readily applied in practice. Reducing uncertainties is essential and necessary to strengthen the scientific and community outcomes of community science, which is of particular importance to ensure the success of projects aimed at detecting novel alien species and monitoring their dynamics across space and time. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10530-022-02858-8.

Indexed as

Biodiversity monitoringCitizen scienceData qualityEpistemic uncertaintyLinguistic uncertaintyNon-native species

Identifiers

PMID36277057
PMCPMC9579088
OpenAlexW4293426469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.