SynthesisComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Effect of Nursing Intervention on Promoting Healing of RW in Patients with Diabetic Foot: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research hotspots and trends in nursing for diabetic foot ulcers: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Patients with Diabetic Foot and Its Reliability and Validity Test.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically assess the effect of nursing intervention on promoting the healing of refractory wounds (RW) in patients with diabetic foot (DF). Methods: A computer search of PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, CochraneLibrary, China knowledge Network Database (CNKI), China VIP Database, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) online database was conducted in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of traditional Chinese and western medicine nursing intervention on patients with RW of DF. Retrieval time was limited to the period from the date the database was established to present. Separately, two researchers gathered the data. RevMan5.3 statistical software was used to analyze the collected data by meta-analysis according to Cochrane Handbook 5.3. Results: Finally, 8 articles were included with a total sample size of 772 cases. The meta-analysis of the wound healing time after intervention indicated that the wound healing time of the study group was notably shorter, and the difference was statistically significant ( Conclusion: The application of traditional Chinese and western medicine nursing intervention when treating DF patients clinically can effectively promote the healing of foot ulcer wounds. Traditional Chinese and western medicine nursing can help patients heal wounds faster and enhance their life quality compared to simplistic western medicine nursing. According to the original literature, the conclusion deserves to be popularized in clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.