Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276956›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Utilizing genomics and historical data to optimize gene pools for new breeding programs: A case study in winter wheat.

Carolina Ballén-Taborda, Jeanette Lyerly, Jared Smith, Kimberly Howell, Gina Brown-Guedira, Md Ali Babar, Stephen A Harrison, Richard E Mason, Mohamed Mergoum, J Paul Murphy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina Ballén-TabordaDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Jeanette LyerlyCrop and Soil Sciences Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Jared SmithU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Raleigh, NC, United States.
Kimberly HowellU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Raleigh, NC, United States.
Gina Brown-GuediraCrop and Soil Sciences Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Md Ali BabarAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Stephen A HarrisonSchool of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Richard E MasonCollege of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Mohamed MergoumDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States.
J Paul MurphyCrop and Soil Sciences Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Russell SuttonDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, Commerce, TX, United States.
Carl A GriffeySchool of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Richard E BoylesDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
North Carolina State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USClemson University · USColorado State University · USLouisiana State University · USTexas A&M University – Commerce · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Georgia · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid generation and preservation of both genomic and phenotypic information for many genotypes within crops and across locations, emerging breeding programs have a valuable opportunity to leverage these resources to 1) establish the most appropriate genetic foundation at program inception and 2) implement robust genomic prediction platforms that can effectively select future breeding lines. Integrating genomics-enabled breeding into cultivar development can save costs and allow resources to be reallocated towards advanced (i.e., later) stages of field evaluation, which can facilitate an increased number of testing locations and replicates within locations. In this context, a reestablished winter wheat breeding program was used as a case study to understand best practices to leverage and tailor existing genomic and phenotypic resources to determine optimal genetics for a specific target population of environments. First, historical multi-environment phenotype data, representing 1,285 advanced breeding lines, were compiled from multi-institutional testing as part of the SunGrains cooperative and used to produce GGE biplots and PCA for yield. Locations were clustered based on highly correlated line performance among the target population of environments into 22 subsets. For each of the subsets generated, EMMs and BLUPs were calculated using linear models with the

Indexed as

breedinggenomic selectionhistorical dataprediction accuracytraining populationswinter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)yield

Identifiers

PMID36276956
PMCPMC9585219
OpenAlexW4303045049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.