Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276918›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2022

Developing a Measure to Quantify Ocular Pain Postoperatively: The Adaptation of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey.

Ayse Yildiz-Tas, Sadi Can Sonmez, Zeynep Busra Kisakurek, Gulsum Deniz, Arzu Baygül, Cem Kesim, Melisa Zisan Karslioglu, Cem Ozturkmen, Rengin Aslihan Kurt, Pedram Hamrah and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ayse Yildiz-TasKoç University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1716-5488
Sadi Can SonmezKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-6691
Zeynep Busra KisakurekKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-9026
Gulsum DenizReserach Center for Translational Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-8491
Arzu BaygülDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0392-6709
Cem KesimKoç University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6747-1534
Melisa Zisan KarsliogluKoç University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7665-4508
Cem OzturkmenGaziantep Goznuru Eye Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Rengin Aslihan KurtBaskent University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9746-149X
Pedram HamrahCenter for Translational Ocular Immunology, Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9313-2939
Afsun SahinKoç University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5083-5618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Since quantification and communication of ocular pain is important for a healthier patient follow-up and postoperative guidance, reliable measures like the Ophthalmic Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) are needed to assess the outcome and management of different operations. To address that need, we carried out the adaptation of OPAS into Turkish to reach different age groups and backgrounds, widening the use of OPAS on patients who underwent an ophthalmic operation. Methods: We used back-translation method and achieved cultural adaptation through content validity scoring by 5 independent ophthalmologists. The survey is then administered three times: preoperatively, postoperatively within 24 hours, and finally a week later in the follow-up visit. Validity is measured in comparison to Visual Analog Scale using Spearman's correlation coefficient and reliability is measured using Cronbach's alpha. Factor analysis is performed by principal component analysis and rotation is performed using Varimax method when necessary. Results: We reached a total of 132 patients with a mean age of 64.2 years. Most of them underwent phacoemulsification ( Conclusion: Through this adaptation of OPAS into a foreign language, we present a reliable and valid tool for postoperative pain quantification, allowing objective measurement of pain in different populations such as the elderly.

Identifiers

PMID36276918
PMCPMC9586810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.