ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022
Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning for Multi-Omics Characterization of Blood Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cells · 2025Pooled it
- Merging artificial intelligence into cancer nursing care: Current applications, challenges, and opportunities.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the IVENUS artificial intelligence model for automated CEAP classification of early-stage chronic venous disease using lower limb photographs.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Prediction of cancer-associated thrombosis by machine learning: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study.ESMO open · 2026Article
- Mechanobiology of cancer-associated thrombosis: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic innovation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Contemporary Challenges in Venous Thromboembolism: Evolving Populations and Implications for Management and Risk Stratification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative venous thromboembolism in esophageal cancer.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Development, validation, and clinical utility of risk prediction models for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A retrospective and prospective cohort study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Optimising hyperparameters with a tree structured Parzen estimator to improve diabetes prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis in Psychiatric Inpatients by Applying Machine Learning to Electronic Health Records: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning to predict the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized for coronary artery disease: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Machine learning in cancer-associated thrombosis: hype or hope in untangling the clot.Bleeding, thrombosis and vascular biology · 2024Article
- Semi-Supervised Learning to Improve Generalizability of Cancer Associated-Venous Thromboembolism Risk Prediction Models.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Hospitalized cancer patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, no predictive model has been specifically developed for this population. Machine learning (ML) is advantageous for model development. This study was aimed at developing predictive models using three different ML algorithms and logistic regression for VTE risk among hospitalized cancer patients and comparing their predictive performance. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted on hospitalized cancer patients at Hunan Cancer Hospital, China, between October 1, 2021, and February 30, 2022. Patients diagnosed with vein thrombosis before or after admission were excluded. Patient, tumor, treatment, and laboratory indicator information was obtained from the hospital information system. The data were randomly split into distributions of 80% for training and 20% for testing. Logistic regression and three ML algorithms-the support vector machine, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were used to develop the models. Model performance was compared using F1, G-mean, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall rate, and specificity. Feature rankings were achieved based on the permutation scores of the selected features in the optimal model. Results: A total of 1100 patients (mean [SD] age, 54.75 [11.08] years; 485 [44.09%] male) were included in this study. There were 340 patients (30.9%) in the VTE group. The XGBoost model achieved the best performance with the following evaluation metrics: F1 (0.750), G-mean (0.816), AUROC (0.818), accuracy (0.845), precision (0.750), recall rate (0.750), and specificity (0.888). D-dimer level, diabetes, hypertension, pleural metastasis, and hematological malignancies were identified as the five most significant features of the XGBoost model. Conclusions: Four predictive models were developed using ML algorithms. The XGBoost model was the optimal predictive model compared with the other three models. This study indicates that ML may play an important role in VTE risk estimation among hospitalized patients with cancer and provides a reference for thromboprophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.