ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Comparison between the Efficacy of
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of the current anti-New microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- Vaginal Royal Jelly for Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials and Methods: This triple-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted on eighty-four 18 to 49-year-old nonpregnant women from August 2019 to February 2020. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups after confirming the diagnosis of VVC infection through fungal culture. Clinical signs and symptoms and lab tests were recorded at baseline and 6-10 days after treatment. The treatment time for each group was seven nights. Results: There were no significant differences in clinical and laboratory evaluations between the two groups at the beginning of the study ( Conclusion: The results of this study show that the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.