ArticleAJOG global reports2022
Reoperation rates of stress incontinence surgery in rural vs urban hospitals.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundXXX.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine the impact of a rural vs urban hospital location on the risk of undergoing a second surgery for stress urinary incontinence. STUDY
designUsing the Cerner Health Facts nationwide electronic medical record database, we identified patients who underwent surgeries for stress incontinence between January 1, 2010 and November 30, 2018. Stress incontinence surgeries included synthetic midurethral slings, fascial slings, retropubic urethral suspension, and other surgeries for stress urinary incontinence, such as the laparoscopic sling or the Pereyra procedure. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, namely those who had a single operation and those who had a reoperation, defined as any second stress incontinence surgery or revision after initial incontinence surgery. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether urban vs rural hospital location impacted reoperation rates. We adjusted for significant sociodemographic variables identified in the univariate analysis with a
resultsOf the 25,085 women who underwent stress incontinence procedures, 669 (2.7%) underwent a second surgery. Of these, 346 (51.7%) patients underwent were a second stress incontinence procedure, 307 (45.9%) underwent revisions of the index case, and 16 (2.4%) underwent both. Women in the single surgery cohort were older (median age, 54 vs 53 years;
conclusionWe did not detect an association between hospital location (rural vs urban) and the risk for reoperation among women undergoing stress incontinence surgery. With low reoperation rates, patients can be reassured that they are receiving excellent care in either setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.