Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276797›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2022

Learning from maternal deaths due to uterine rupture: review of cases from peri-urban Uganda.

Imelda Namagembe, Sarah M Chukwuma, Annettee Nakimuli, Noah Kiwanuka, Josaphat Byamugisha, Ashley Moffett, Catherine E Aiken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Public health action · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Imelda NamagembeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University and Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda (Drs Namagembe, Nakimuli, and Byamugisha).
Sarah M ChukwumaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom (Ms Chukwuma).
Annettee NakimuliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University and Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda (Drs Namagembe, Nakimuli, and Byamugisha).
Noah KiwanukaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda (Dr Kiwanuka).
Josaphat ByamugishaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University and Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda (Drs Namagembe, Nakimuli, and Byamugisha).
Ashley MoffettDepartment of Pathology and Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Dr Moffett).
Catherine E AikenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Rosie Hospital and National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Dr Aiken).
Makerere University · UGJames Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMulago Hospital · UGUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal deaths from uterine rupture continue to occur globally, with particularly high rates in sub-Saharan Africa. Maternal death reviews have been shown to be an effective part of cohesive strategies to prevent future deaths.

objectiveThis study aimed to conduct maternal death reviews for all deaths following uterine rupture in the study center, to assess preventability, and to synthesize key learning points that may help to prevent future maternal deaths following uterine rupture. STUDY

designThorough case reviews of all maternal deaths from 2016 to 2018 at the study center (a national referral hospital in urban Uganda) were conducted by trained multidisciplinary panels of obstetricians and midwives. Medical records of women who died following uterine rupture (n=37, 10.6% of all maternal deaths) were extracted for further analysis.

resultsMost maternal deaths due to uterine rupture (36/37, 97%) were preventable, with most having been still potentially preventable after the women reached the study center (24/36, 67%). Obstructed labor was the leading cause of uterine rupture, accounting for 73% (27/37) of cases. Previous cesarean delivery was confirmed in 38% (14/37) of cases. The incidence of grand multiparity was 11% (4/37), and 11% (4/37) were primiparous. Most women (28/37, 76%) died within 24 hours of admission. On arrival at the study center, 19 (51%) were critically ill. Exploratory laparotomy was performed in 54% (20/37) of cases, and a further 35% (13/37) died while awaiting laparotomy. Four women died shortly after arrival at the study center (within 1 hour) and received basic resuscitative treatment; 27% (10/37) of women who died had received antenatal planning or preparation.

conclusionMost deaths due to uterine rupture were preventable. The key lessons that emerged from the reviews were: (1) careful birth preparation and complication awareness for women with known risk factors, (2) early recognition of obstructed labor, (3) close monitoring of obstetrical interventions known to be associated with uterine rupture, and (4) treating incipient or suspected uterine rupture as a time-critical obstetrical emergency. The recommendations emerging from our narrative reviews are suitable for implementation in low-resource obstetrical settings, where high numbers of deaths involving uterine rupture occur.

Indexed as

birth preparationcesarean deliverymaternal deathobstructed laborpartographsub-Saharan AfricaUgandauterine rupture

Identifiers

PMID36276797
PMCPMC9563662
OpenAlexW4282922928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.