ArticleAJOG global reports2022
Association between Robson classification groups and cesarean delivery: a longitudinal analysis in Mongolia.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cesarean delivery in a tertiary institution of the Republic of Moldova: analysis using the Robson classification.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of cesarean deliveries has increased sharply worldwide over the last 3 decades. The World Health Organization recommends using the Robson classification as the best tool for monitoring and auditing cesarean delivery rates and to safely reduce the rate of avoidable cesarean deliveries.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify the association between the Robson classification groups and cesarean delivery in 2008 and 2018 at the Urguu Maternity Hospital, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, and to examine the changes in this association over 10 years. STUDY
designThis cross-sectional study was conducted using 21,225 participants' electronic birth records (9544 in 2008 and 11,681 in 2018) from the Urguu Maternity Hospital. Birth records were categorized into 10 groups using the Robson classification report table. Multiple logistic regressions were conducted to examine the association between the Robson classification group and the cesarean delivery rate for 2008 and 2018. The same regression analysis was subsequently conducted using a pooled data set to capture the changes in the association among the Robson classification group, a birth-year dummy, and the cesarean delivery rate.
resultsThe odds of having a cesarean delivery when classified in group 1 in 2018 (adjusted odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-4.94;
conclusionThe high percentage of mothers classified as group 5 who gave birth via cesarean delivery suggests that healthcare providers should work with mothers in group 5 to increase their willingness to give birth vaginally after a previous cesarean delivery in an attempt to reduce the overall cesarean delivery rates. Further research is needed to better understand the factors that may influence the increasing rates of birth through cesarean delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.