Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276784›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2022

Estimated costs of preoperative evaluation of postmenopausal hysterectomy for prolapse at a safety-net hospital: an observational descriptive study.

Sam J F Melville, Syem Barakzai, Molly Dahl, Emma Koltun-Baker, Enanyeli Rangel, Christina E Dancz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam J F MelvilleDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Syem BarakzaiDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Molly DahlDepartments of Obstetrics and Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Emma Koltun-BakerDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Enanyeli RangelDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Christina E DanczDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn practice, preoperative evaluation prior to hysterectomy varies. Unnecessary preoperative evaluation may add cost and risk with little benefit to the patient.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe practice patterns and the associated costs related to preoperative evaluations before hysterectomy for prolapse at a safety-net hospital. STUDY

designThis was a retrospective cohort study of postmenopausal women who underwent a hysterectomy for prolapse. Nonfacility-associated cost data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare Services. The biopsy cost was estimated to be $172.55 and $125.23 for ultrasounds.

resultsA total of 505 postmenopausal cases were identified. Of those, 155 (31%) underwent a preoperative biopsy, 305 (60%) had an ultrasound, and 124 (25%) had both. Of those, 72.9% had an indication for a biopsy. A total of 64 biopsies and 216 ultrasounds lacked clear indication. Of those, 56 biopsies were performed for bleeding in cases with an endometrial thickness of <4 mm. The total cost of nonvalue-added testing was $42,576.

conclusionAdherence to a strict preoperative algorithm would have saved $38,092 over the study period, although 0.50% of these biopsies would potentially have detected endometrial cancer preoperatively. These results underscore the value of clinical algorithms at teaching institutions.

Indexed as

biopsycost analysiscost savingspostmenopausalpreoperative evaluationultrasoundvaluewaste

Identifiers

PMID36276784
PMCPMC9563550
OpenAlexW4288078124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.