Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276760›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

Increasing Collaborative Discussion in Case-Based Learning Improves Student Engagement and Knowledge Acquisition.

Nana Sartania, Sharon Sneddon, James G Boyle, Emily McQuarrie, Harry P de Koning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Responding to Bias: Equipping Residents With Tools to Address Microaggressions.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nana SartaniaUndergraduate Medical School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3196-2312
Sharon SneddonUndergraduate Medical School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9767-4180
James G BoyleUndergraduate Medical School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Emily McQuarrieUndergraduate Medical School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-2491
Harry P de KoningInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9963-1827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the transition from academic to clinical learning, the development of clinical reasoning skills and teamwork is essential, but not easily achieved by didactic teaching only. Case-based learning (CBL) was designed to stimulate discussions of genuine clinical cases and diagnoses but in our initial format (CBL'10) remained predominantly tutor-driven rather than student-directed. However, interactive teaching methods stimulate deep learning and consolidate taught material, and we therefore introduced a more collaborative CBL (cCBL), featuring a structured format with discussions in small breakout groups. This aimed to increase student participation and improve learning outcomes. Method: A survey with open and closed questions was distributed among 149 students and 36 tutors that had participated in sessions of both CBL formats. A statistical analysis compared exam scores of topics taught via CBL'10 and cCBL. Results: Students and tutors both evaluated the switch to cCBL positively, reporting that it increased student participation and enhanced consolidation and integration of the wider subject area. They also reported that the cCBL sessions increased constructive discussion and stimulated deep learning. Moreover, tutors found the more structured cCBL sessions easier to facilitate. Analysis of exam results showed that summative assessment scores of subjects switched to cCBL significantly increased compared to previous years, whereas scores of subjects that remained taught as CBL'10 did not change. Conclusions: Compared to our initial, tutor-led CBL format, cCBL resulted in improved educational outcomes, leading to increased participation, confidence, discussion and higher exam scores.

Indexed as

Case-based learningCollaborative learningMedical educationSmall group teaching

Identifiers

PMID36276760
PMCPMC9584010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.