Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276758›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

Medical Students and Their Perceptions of Digital Medicine: a Question of Gender?

Valentina Faihs, Christina Figalist, Eileen Bossert, Katja Weimann, Pascal O Berberat, Marjo Wijnen-Meijer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentina FaihsTUM Medical Education Center, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-2521
Christina FigalistTUM Medical Education Center, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Eileen BossertTUM Medical Education Center, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Katja WeimannTUM Medical Education Center, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Pascal O BerberatTUM Medical Education Center, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Marjo Wijnen-MeijerTUM Medical Education Center, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-5047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technologies play an essential role in the medical sector of today and the future. In a cross-sectional online survey at a German medical university, male students more frequently reported keeping themselves informed about digital medicine outside of their studies across all clinical years of study. While female students self-assessed their knowledge in different fields of digital medicine as worse than their male peers in the first clinical years of study, no more gender differences could be found towards the final year. However, students of both genders showed a strong desire for further education on the topic of digital medicine.

Indexed as

CurriculumDigital literacyDigital medicineMedical educationWearables

Identifiers

PMID36276758
PMCPMC9584022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.