ArticleJTCVS techniques2022
Cardiac function unchanged following reanimation with normothermic regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Donation after circulatory death transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and methods of donation.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether hearts reanimated with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) have clinically detectable changes in function using echocardiography comparing the prearrest and post-NRP imaging. As heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) continues to increase, preliminary results suggest outcomes comparable with donation after brain death. It is unknown whether the obligatory period of warm ischemia experienced during DCD withdrawal process causes immediate changes in cardiac allograft function following in situ reanimation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and compared predonation with postreanimation echocardiographic findings in all DCD donors at our institution from January to October 2021. All DCD donor organs were reanimated with in situ thoracoabdominal NRP after circulatory death. Echocardiographic assessment included (1) 2-dimensional and speckle-tracking measures of chamber size and function; (2) ejection fraction; (3) fractional area change; and (4) global longitudinal strain. Results: Altogether, 4 DCD heart donations were performed during the study period. Basic demographics and withdrawal ischemic time periods are reported. There were no changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular fractional area change when comparing the predonation and the postreanimation echocardiogram. There was a minimal, nonstatistically significant decrease in left ventricular global longitudinal strain and right ventricular free-wall systolic strain in 3 of the 4 donors following reanimation. Conclusions: DCD cardiac allografts reanimated with NRP demonstrated no change in echocardiographic parameters used for a standard predonation donor heart evaluation. Findings suggest cardiac function of DCD allografts reanimated with thoracoabdominal NRP is not adversely impacted by limited period of warm ischemia following circulatory arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.