Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276661›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Fracture Risk in Patients with Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Renming Chen, Qin Huang, Lihua Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a new perspective on risk factors and clinical prediction models.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renming ChenDepartment of Nephropathy and Rheumatology,The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, 445000, People's Republic of China.
Qin HuangDepartment of Nephropathy and Rheumatology,The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, 445000, People's Republic of China.
Lihua ChenDepartment of Nephropathy and Rheumatology,The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, 445000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Fracture is a critical unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis(RA) and osteoporosis. At present, models involving clinical indices that accurately predict fracture are still uncommon. We addressed this gap by developing machine learning (ML)-based predictive models to individualize the risk of fracture in elderly patients with RA and osteoporosis and to identify a high-risk group for fracture. Methods: 487 patients diagnosed with RA and osteoporosis at the Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture were randomly divided into a training cohort (used for building the model) and a validation cohort (used for validating the model). Five ML-assisted models were developed from candidate clinical features using two-step estimation methods. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC) were performed to evaluate the robustness and clinical practicability of each model. Results: A total of twenty-two candidate variables were included, and the prediction model was established by an ML-based algorithm. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of the random forest classifier (RFC) model, artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), decision tree (DT), probability of major osteoporotic fractures (PMOF), and probability of hip fracture (PHF) ranged from 0.695 to 0.878. Among them, RFC obtained the optimal prediction efficiency via adding serum selenium and clinical indices, that is, glucocorticoid, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Conclusion: Based on the classic clinical parameters, the fracture risk of RA patients with osteoporosis can be accurately predicted. In particular, RFC prediction model shows good discrimination ability in identifying high-risk patients with fracture.

Indexed as

fracturemachine learning algorithmosteoporosispredictive modelrheumatoid arthritisrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID36276661
PMCPMC9581722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.