ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022
Implementation of CT Image Segmentation Based on an Image Segmentation Algorithm.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Retracted: Implementation of CT Image Segmentation Based on an Image Segmentation Algorithm.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-16Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0A1D5FF99981BBFE926E7DBA6778D2
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasingly important role of image segmentation in the field of computed tomography (CT) image segmentation, the requirements for image segmentation technology in related industries are constantly improving. When the hardware resources can fully meet the needs of the fast and high-precision image segmentation program system, the main means of how to improve the image segmentation effect is to improve the related algorithms. Therefore, this study has proposed a combination of genetic algorithm (GA) and Great Law (OTSU) algorithm to form an image segmentation algorithm-immune genetic algorithm (IGA) algorithm. The algorithm has improved the segmentation accuracy and efficiency of the original algorithm, which is beneficial to the more accurate results of CT image segmentation. The experimental results in this study have shown that the operating efficiency of the OTSU segmentation algorithm is up to 75%. The operating efficiency of the GA algorithm is up to 78%. The operating efficiency of the IGA algorithm is up to 92%. In terms of operating efficiency, the OTSU segmentation algorithm has more advantages. In terms of segmentation accuracy, the highest accuracy rate of OTSU segmentation algorithm is 45%. The accuracy of the GA algorithm is 80%. The highest accuracy of the IGA algorithm is 97%. The IGA algorithm is more powerful in terms of operating efficiency and accuracy. Therefore, the application of the IGA algorithm to CT image segmentation is beneficial to doctors to better judge the lesions and improve the diagnosis rate.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.