ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2022
Direct cost analysis for 32,783 samples with preanalytical phase errors.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Best practices in sample management & pre-analytical quality control: overcoming challenges in resource-limited laboratory settings.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Review
- Establishing denominator-consistent Six Sigma benchmarks for venous blood specimen rejection: a multi-center retrospective quality-indicator study using 21 million specimens in Western China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveErrors in the laboratory process often occur in the preanalytical phase (PA). The study aims to calculate the direct cost elements of PA errors, including material, logistics, transfer, personnel workforce, and medical waste.
methodsMedical laboratory PA phase errors were retrospectively reviewed using the Laboratory Information Management System. We evaluated the whole 2019 laboratory data of the 836-bed Health Sciences University Umraniye Training and Research Hospital (UTRH). We assessed the direct cost elements of PA errors, such as those related to material, logistics, transfer, human resources, and waste. We performed the procedure for both samples analyzed in the hospital and transferred to the central laboratory.
resultsWe analyzed 1,939,650 patient samples and 46,534,532 parameters studied in 2019 for UTRH. The rates for rejected tests and rejected samples (tube) for UTRH were noted as 0.32% and 1.7%, respectively. The total direct cost for PA errors was TRY 438,284.51 (68,918.07 euros) for 32,783 patient samples and 147,893 tests. We calculated the total cost for PA test errors detected in the hospital as TRY 390,238.06, while the total cost for PA test errors detected in the central laboratory was TRY 48,046.45. 89% of the total cost was for PA errors detected in the hospital, and 11% was for the errors detected in the central laboratory. The 2019 direct PA error cost we calculated based on our hospital's data was 0.153% of the 2019 hospital operating cost. We calculated the direct cost per rejected sample as TRY 13.37 (2.1 Euro).
conclusionProviding reliable laboratory service with the least possible financial loss is one of the main goals in terms of laboratory medicine. In achieving this goal, the prevention of error costs is a priority. The direct cost elements for the PA phase, where laboratory errors are concentrated, can be easily identified. The amount of PA phase error direct cost will attract the attention of health policy decision-makers and field professionals and inspire further research. Therefore, we tried to determine a threshold cost regarding interventions and practices required to prevent PA phase errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.