ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2022
Isolated abducens nerve palsy: Comparison of microvascular and other causes.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Neurosyphilis Presenting with Isolated Abducens Nerve Palsy.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Abducens nerve palsy in patients with spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage: A case report.Medicine · 2025Article
- Real time video-based gaze tracking for detecting subtle deviation angle change in abducens nerve palsy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Isolated abducens nerve palsy following upper respiratory infection in a patient with ipsilateral chronic sphenoid sinusitis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- A Male Patient Presents With Isolated Abducens Nerve Palsy: An Atypical Presentation of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.Cureus · 2024Article
- Improvement of Isolated Abducens Nerve Palsy with Hydrocephalus after CSF Diversion: A Possible Evaluative Role of Retroclival-pontomedullary Distance.NMC case report journal · 2024Article
- Isolated Abducens Nerve Palsy in the Setting of Isolated Sphenoid Sinusitis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAbducens nerve paralysis is the most common ocular motor neuropathy. In this article, we aimed to compare the causes of isolated abducens nerve palsy in terms of demographic, clinical features, and prognosis.
methodsThirty-six isolated abducens nerve palsy patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. The demographic, clinical features, and prognosis compared in two etiological groups as microvascular and other causes.
resultsThe most common etiology was microvascular, which was seen in 16/36 (44.4%) patients. Mean clinical recovery time was 2.5±1.3 months (range, 10 days-6 months). When etiological groups were compared as microvascular and other causes, the mean age of the microvascular group was significantly higher (62.8±13.3 vs. 44.5±16.4, p=0.001). Diabetes mellitus was seen significantly higher in the microvascular group than other causes group (p=0.001), but no significant difference was observed in terms of other atherosclerotic risk factors (p>0.05). The fasting blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c value were significantly higher in the microvascular group (p=0.02 and p=0.02, respectively). There was no significant difference in terms of clinical improvement and clinical recovery times between groups (p>0.05).
conclusionThere is no difference between microvascular group and other causes in terms of clinical outcome, while the mean age and presence of diabetes were higher in the microvascular group. The presence of diabetes should be questioned in cases with isolated abducens nerve palsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.