ReviewJournal of food science and technology2022
Recent trends and developments of PCR-based methods for the detection of food-borne
Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Day Salmonella spp. Detection Method Based on Real-Time PCR for Foods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- An Oscillating-Flow Microfluidic PCR Method for Rapid and Flexible Detection of Periodontal Pathogens.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dual-recognition colorimetric platform based on porous Au@Pt nanozymes for highly sensitive washing-free detection of Staphylococcus aureus.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Foodborne Viruses and Somatic Coliphages Occurrence in Fresh Produce at Retail from Northern Mexico.Food and environmental virology · 2024Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Rapid GII Norovirus Detection Method Based on CRISPR-Cas12a.Polish journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- On-Site Fluorescent Detection of Sepsis-Inducing Bacteria using a Graphene-Oxide CRISPR-Cas12a (GO-CRISPR) System.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- A Review of Modern Methods for the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- A Review of Isothermal Amplification Methods and Food-Origin Inhibitors against Detecting Food-Borne Pathogens.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, rapid detection methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) have been continuously developed to improve the detection of food-borne pathogens in food samples. The recent developments of PCR and qPCR in the detection and identification of these food-borne pathogens are described and elaborated throughout this review. Specifically, further developments and improvements of qPCR are discussed in detecting
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.