ReviewHeart international2020
The Quantification of Total Coronary Atheroma Burden - A Major Step Forward.
Review in Heart international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Angiographic Burden of Coronary Atherosclerosis Partially Mediates the Association Between ASCVD Risk Factors and Outcomes.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Article
- Carotid calcifications in panoramic radiographs can predict vascular risk.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Article
- Atherosclerotic coronary plaque regression from lipid-lowering therapies: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extent of coronary artery disease has been shown to be an important indicator of prognosis. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has the ability to measure plaque, with both coronary artery calcium scanning and CT angiography (CTA), to give a measure of total atheroma burden. Beyond assessing stenosis and atherosclerosis, CTA can assess high-risk plaque. These plaques are thought to be consistent with plaques that are vulnerable and more likely to rupture and cause acute coronary syndromes. However, the high-risk plaque concept suffers from poor reproducibility and poor positive predictive power. Total coronary atheroma burden has been shown to be a better predictor of coronary events than high-risk plaques or stenosis. This paper reviews the literature in this regard and demonstrates total coronary atheroma burden to be the best predictor of future cardiovascular disease. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library database for studies assessing plaque burden and outcomes by CT. We used text words and related Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) for cardiac, calcification, plaque burden, CT, prognosis, mortality, event, death, survival and myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.