ReviewHeart international2020
Use of Coronary Computed Tomography for Calcium Screening of Atherosclerosis.
Review in Heart international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal Changes in Coronary Artery Calcium Distribution and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Coronary Artery Calcification: From Molecular Mechanisms to Interventional Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multiple calcified basal cell carcinomas in an asymptomatic patient with a very elevated coronary calcium score.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Relationship between the prevalence of breast arterial calcifications on mammography and coronary calcifications on Chest CT: A cross-sectional study.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- Impaired microcirculation in the skin and subclinical atherosclerosis in individuals with dysglycaemia in a large population-based cohort.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Factors affecting the performance of a novel artificial intelligence-based coronary computed tomography-derived ischaemia algorithm.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring serves as a highly specific marker of coronary atherosclerosis. Based on the results of multiple large-scale, longitudinal population-based studies, CAC scoring has emerged as a reliable predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) presence and risk assessment in asymptomatic patients across all age, sex and racial groups. Therefore, the measurement of CAC is useful in guiding clinical decision-making for primary prevention (e.g. use of statin and aspirin). This tool has already been incorporated into the clinical guidelines and is steadily being integrated into standard clinical practice. The adoption of CAC scoring will be important for curbing the progressive burden that ASCVD is exerting on our healthcare system. It has already been projected that CAC testing will decrease healthcare spending and will hopefully be shown to improve ASCVD outcomes. The purpose of this review is to summarise the evidence regarding calcium screening for atherosclerosis, particularly in asymptomatic individuals, including the pathophysiology, the prognostic power of CAC in the context of population-based studies, the progressive inclusion of CAC into clinical guidelines and the existing concerns of cost and radiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.