ArticleOncology letters2022
Sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesothelioma treated with nivolumab: A case series.
Article in Oncology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A histomorphological atlas of resected mesothelioma discovered by self-supervised learning from 3446 whole-slide images.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) with nivolumab has been widely used to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) since clinical trials confirmed its efficacy. However, only a few clinical trials have been conducted for the treatment of sarcomatoid MPM, which is a rare histological type of MPM. Additionally, clinical reports of sarcomatoid MPM are scarce. Therefore, the benefits and risks of nivolumab treatment for sarcomatoid MPM remain unclear. The present report describes the treatment of 3 cases of sarcomatoid MPM (all 3 were men) with nivolumab monotherapy. In all three cases, nivolumab was effective despite variations in the duration of treatment, although side effects were observed in 2 patients. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was positive in all 3 cases. In particular, the patient with the highest PD-L1 expression had the most rapid response of the 3 patients, and the effect lasted as long as those of the other 2, despite receiving the smallest number of doses of nivolumab. It has been reported that sarcomatoid MPM tends to respond poorly to chemotherapy and express higher levels of PD-L1 than epithelial MPM; thus, ICT may be necessary in these cases. This case series suggests that ICT with nivolumab is a promising treatment option for sarcomatoid MPM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.