Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276370›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

A cross-sectional study to assess the level of satisfaction with virtual education in Peruvian medical students.

Pamela Grados-Espinoza, J Pierre Zila-Velasque, David R Soriano-Moreno, Kateriny Margot Regalado-Rodríguez, Frank Sosa-Nuñez, William Barzola-Farfán, Jim Gronerth, Lucia Guizado, Christian R Mejia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela Grados-EspinozaFacultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión, Pasco, Peru.
J Pierre Zila-VelasqueFacultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión, Pasco, Peru.
David R Soriano-MorenoUnidad de Investigación Clínica y Epidemiológica, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Peru.
Kateriny Margot Regalado-RodríguezSociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Peru.
Frank Sosa-NuñezEscuela Profesional de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional de San Cristóbal de Huamanga, Ayacucho, Peru.
William Barzola-FarfánSociedad Científica San Fernando, Lima, Peru.
Jim GronerthFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad César Vallejo, Trujillo, Peru.
Lucia GuizadoSociedad Científica de estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
Christian R MejiaTranslational Medicine Research Centre, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Daniel Alcides Carrión National University · PENational University of Cajamarca · PEPeruvian Union University · PEPeruvian University of Applied Sciences · PESan Cristóbal of Huamanga University · PEUniversidad César Vallejo · PEUniversidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversidad Norbert Wiener · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Education has totally changed in the context of the pandemic. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the factors associated with the level of satisfaction with virtual education in Peruvian medical students during COVID-19. Methods: Analytical and cross-sectional study, based on an online survey of students nationwide. We use previously validated instruments to measure the level of satisfaction and stress (EPP-10-c) of students with virtual education. For the associated factors, adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) were estimated using Poisson regression. Results: Of the 1,878 students surveyed, the median age was 21 years, 57.8% (1,086) were women, 34.8% (654) had a high level of satisfaction with virtual education and 10.7% (202) presented high levels of stress. The factors associated with a low level of satisfaction were attending the fifth year of study, the partial and non-virtual adaptation of the university to virtual education, and a high level of stress. On the other hand, the factors associated with a high level of satisfaction were the education platform used and the study method used. Conclusion: Seven out of 10 students presented a low level of satisfaction with virtual education, 1 out of 10 presented a high level of stress. The factors associated with the low level of satisfaction were attending the fifth year of study, the non-virtual and partial adaptation of the university to virtual education, and the high level of stress.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePersonal SatisfactionPeruYoung Adultcross-sectional survey designepidemiologyevaluationLatinosmental health

Identifiers

PMID36276370
PMCPMC9581305
OpenAlexW4301585702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.