Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276267›Full record

ArticleRestoration ecology2022

Riparian vegetation shade restoration and loss effects on recent and future stream temperatures.

Matthew R Fuller, Peter Leinenbach, Naomi E Detenbeck, Rochelle Labiosa, Daniel J Isaak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Restoration ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew R FullerOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Postdoc at the Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9147-5110
Peter LeinenbachRegion 10, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 6th Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101, USA.
Naomi E DetenbeckAtlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA.
Rochelle LabiosaRegion 10, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 6th Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101, USA.
Daniel J IsaakRocky Mountain Research Station, US Forest Service, 322 East Front Street, Boise, Idaho 83702, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

River temperatures are expected to increase this century harming species requiring cold-water habitat unless restoration activities protect or improve habitat availability. Local shading by riparian vegetation can cool water temperatures, but uncertainty exists over the scaling of this local effect to larger spatial extents. We evaluate this issue using a regional spatial stream network temperature model with covariates representing shade effects to predict mean August stream temperatures across 78,195 km of tributaries flowing into the Columbia River in the northwestern US. We evaluate nine scenarios predicting stream temperatures for three riparian shade conditions (current, restored, and no riparian vegetation) within three different climate periods (2000s, 2040s, and 2080s). Results suggest riparian shade restoration (2000s climate) could decrease mean August stream temperatures by 0.62°C across the study network. Under the same restored shade conditions, temperature predictions for tributaries at their confluence with the Columbia River range from 0.02-2.08°C cooler than under current shade conditions. The climate warming effect predicted for the 2040s and 2080s, however, is greater than the cooling effect from restoring riparian shade. Streams less than 10m bankfull width cooled more frequently with riparian shade restoration. In Oregon, the proportion of fish habitat for salmon and trout rearing and migration that meet temperature numeric water quality criteria could be increased by 20% under restored shade conditions although net habitat declines may still occur in the future. We conclude riparian vegetation restoration could partially mitigate future warming and help maintain cold-water habitats that function as thermal refuges if implemented strategically.

Indexed as

climate changecold-water habitatecological forecastingspatial stream network modelthermal refugethermal water quality standards

Identifiers

PMID36276267
PMCPMC9580334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.