Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276257›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society

Retinopathy of prematurity screening: A narrative review of current programs, teleophthalmology, and diagnostic support systems.

Zachary Tan, Michael Isaacs, Zhuoting Zhu, Samantha Simkin, Mingguang He, Shuan Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A review on retinopathy of prematurity.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Update on retinopathy of prematurity.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zachary TanCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael IsaacsDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Zhuoting ZhuCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Brisbane, Australia.
Samantha SimkinDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mingguang HeCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Brisbane, Australia.
Shuan DaiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeonatal care in middle-income countries has improved over the last decade, leading to a "third epidemic" of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Without concomitant improvements in ROP screening infrastructure, reduction of ROP-associated visual loss remains a challenge worldwide. The emergence of teleophthalmology screening programs and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies represents promising methods to address this growing unmet demand in ROP screening. An improved understanding of current ROP screening programs may inform the adoption of these novel technologies in ROP care.

methodsA critical narrative review of the literature was carried out. Publications that were representative of established or emerging ROP screening programs in high-, middle-, and low-income countries were selected for review. Screening programs were reviewed for inclusion criteria, screening frequency and duration, modality, and published sensitivity and specificity.

resultsScreening inclusion criteria, including age and birth weight cutoffs, showed significant heterogeneity globally. Countries of similar income tend to have similar criteria. Three primary screening modalities including binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO), wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI), and teleophthalmology were identified and reviewed. BIO has documented limitations in reduced interoperator agreement, scalability, and geographical access barriers, which are mitigated in part by WFDRI. Teleophthalmology screening may address limitations in ROP screening workforce distribution and training. Opportunities for AI technologies were identified in the context of these limitations, including interoperator reliability and possibilities for point-of-care diagnosis.

conclusionLimitations in the current ROP screening include scalability, geographical access, and high screening burden with low treatment yield. These may be addressable through increased adoption of teleophthalmology and AI technologies. As the global incidence of ROP continues to increase, implementation of these novel modalities requires greater consideration.

Indexed as

Pediatricretinopathyscreening

Identifiers

PMID36276257
PMCPMC9583350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.