ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
Predictors of limited early response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration with machine learning feature importance.
Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of response to bevacizumab monotherapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a 12-month retrospective study.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) have varying responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. Limited early response (LER) after three monthly loading doses is associated with poor long-term vision outcomes. This study predicts LER in nAMD and uses feature importance analysis to explain how baseline variables influence predicted LER risk.
methodsBaseline age, best visual acuity (BVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and baseline and 3 months intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) for 286 eyes were collected in a retrospective clinical chart review. At month 3, LER was defined as the presence of fluid, while early response (ER) was the absence thereof. Decision tree classification and feature importance methods determined the influence of baseline age, BVA, CST, IRF, and SRF, on predicted LER risk.
resultsOne hundred and sixty-seven eyes were LERs and 119 were ERs. The algorithm achieved area under the curve = 0.66 in predicting LER. Baseline SRF was most important for predicting LER while age, BVA, CST, and IRF were somewhat less important. Nonlinear trends were observed between baseline variables and predicted LER risk. Zones of increased predicted LER risk were identified, including age <74 years, and CST <290 or >350 μm, IRF >750 nL, and SRF >150 nL.
conclusionThese findings explain baseline variable importance for predicting LER and show SRF to be the most important. The nonlinear impact of baseline variables on predicted risk is shown, increasing understanding of LER and aiding clinicians in assessing personalized LER risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.