Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276243›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in food science2022

A review on application of molecular simulation technology in food molecules interaction.

Yan Wang, Tianjiao Liu, Jinhui Xie, Meijia Cheng, Lirui Sun, Shuai Zhang, Jiaying Xin, Na Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in food science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Phytochemical Analysis and Compound Profiling ofAnalytical science advances · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Special Issue "Third Edition: Advances in Molecular Simulation".International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yan WangKey Laboratory for Food Science & Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, PR China.
Tianjiao LiuKey Laboratory for Food Science & Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, PR China.
Jinhui XieKey Laboratory for Food Science & Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, PR China.
Meijia ChengKey Laboratory for Food Science & Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, PR China.
Lirui SunKey Laboratory for Food Science & Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, PR China.
Shuai ZhangKey Laboratory for Food Science & Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, PR China.
Jiaying XinKey Laboratory for Food Science & Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, PR China.
Na ZhangKey Laboratory for Food Science & Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular simulation is a new technology to analyze the interaction between molecules. This review mainly summarizes the application of molecular simulation technology in the food industry. This technology has been employed to assess structural changes of biomolecules, the interaction between components, and the mechanism of physical and chemical property alterations. These conclusions provide a deeper understanding of the molecular interaction mechanism in foods, break through the limitations of scientific experiments and avoid blind and time-consuming scientific research. In this paper, the advantages and development trends of molecular simulation technology in the food research field are described. This methodology can be used to contribute to further studies of the mechanism of molecular interactions in food, confirm experimental results and provide new ideas for research in the field of food sciences.

Indexed as

AdvantagesApplication in foodsDevelopment trendMolecular simulation

Identifiers

PMID36276243
PMCPMC9579209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.