Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276174›Full record

ArticleWestern Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR

Tool for tracking all-cause mortality and estimating excess mortality to support the COVID-19 pandemic response.

Duan Mengjuan, Mark S Handcock, Bart Blackburn, Fiona Kee, Viema Biaukula, Tamano Matsui, Babatunde Olowokure

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Duan MengjuanDivision of Data, Strategy & Innovation Team, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Mark S HandcockDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Bart BlackburnDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Fiona KeeDivision of Data, Strategy & Innovation Team, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Viema BiaukulaDivision of Health Security and Emergencies, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Tamano MatsuiDivision of Health Security and Emergencies, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Babatunde OlowokureDivision of Health Security and Emergencies, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific · PHUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problem: Quantifying mortality from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is difficult, especially in countries with limited resources. Comparing mortality data between countries is also challenging, owing to differences in methods for reporting mortality. Context: Tracking all-cause mortality (ACM) and comparing it with expected ACM from pre-pandemic data can provide an estimate of the overall burden of mortality related to the COVID-19 pandemic and support public health decision-making. This study validated an ACM calculator to estimate excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Action: The ACM calculator was developed as a tool for computing expected ACM and excess mortality at national and subnational levels. It was developed using R statistical software, was based on a previously described model that used non-parametric negative binomial regression and was piloted in several countries. Goodness-of-fit was validated by forecasting 2019 mortality from 2015-2018 data. Outcome: Three key lessons were identified from piloting the tool: using the calculator to compare reported provisional ACM with expected ACM can avoid potential false conclusions from comparing with historical averages alone; using disaggregated data at the subnational level can detect excess mortality by avoiding dilution of total numbers at the national level; and interpretation of results should consider system-related performance indicators. Discussion: Timely tracking of ACM to estimate excess mortality is important for the response to COVID-19. The calculator can provide countries with a way to analyse and visualize ACM and excess mortality at national and subnational levels.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36276174
PMCPMC9580363
OpenAlexW4307231401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.