ArticleJournal of clinical and translational pathology2022
A Simple, Robust, and Cost-effective Method for Genotyping Small-scale Mutations.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rat models of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura reveal crucial role of placental ADAMTS13 in perinatal survival.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Generating adamts13Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Modeling ANKRD26 5'-UTR mutation-related thrombocytopenia.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Methods for Assessing On-Target Gene Editing Efficiencies.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Loss of the methylarginine reader function of SND1 confers resistance to hepatocellular carcinoma.The Biochemical journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and objectives: Genotyping is an important tool for studying gene functions in animals or detecting genetic variants in humans. Various methods using low to high concentrations of agarose or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis have been developed for genotyping. These methods rely on the detection of large-size differences (20-2,000 bp) of targeted PCR products between a wild-type gene and a mutant gene. Endonuclease digestion was introduced to identify heterozygous mutations, but it was not possible to differentiate the wild-type from the homozygous mutants with the same or similar size. This study thus developed a novel, simple, and reliable test for genotyping animals or cells following genetic modifications. Methods: We developed an improved and simple method that used 2% agarose gel electrophoresis following T7E1 or Surveyor endonuclease digestion to firstly separate the heterozygous mutations from the wild-type or homozygous mutations. By adding a wild-type PCR product to a potentially homozygous product, which would form heteroduplexes, we could then separate the wild-type from a homozygous mutation with a nearly identical size or only a single base pair substitution without Sanger sequencing. Results: We verified this method in genotyping zebrafish mutants with a 2-8-bp deletion or insertion and mouse mutants with a 1- or 8-bp substitution. The wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous mutations ranged 1-8 bp were clearly differentiated on agarose gel. Sanger sequencing also confirmed our genotyping results. Conclusions: This novel and improved genotyping method may have a broad application in many clinical and research laboratories for rapid and economical genotyping of patients and animals with a small area deletion or single base pair substitution, particularly in the era of gene editing or in those with naturally occurring mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.