ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Laparoscopic treatment for an intrapancreatic accessory spleen: A case report.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Solid and cystic intrapancreatic accessory spleen: report of 10 cases in a single institution.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant pancreatic tumors have early metastasis, aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Surgeons often need to judge whether a patient needs prompt surgery when a pancreatic lesion is found. The accessory spleen is a congenital developmental malformation rather than a tumor and does not require surgical resection. Here, we report a 47-year-old man who underwent routine gastroscopic examination, and a submucosal eminence of the duodenal bulb was detected. The patient was asymptomatic and laboratory tests were unremarkable. Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasm (G2) was considered following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Further examination showed a lesion in the tail of the pancreas and multiple accessory spleens. The lesion in the tail of the pancreas was Ga-68 positive and was highly considered a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). Based on this clinical evidence, laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Kimura) was performed. However, the results of the postoperative pathological diagnosis indicated an intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS). Given the findings of this case, we should explore more accurate diagnostic methods for IPAS to avoid unnecessary surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.