Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276097›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

The independent adverse prognostic significance of 1q21 gain/amplification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Hongying You, Song Jin, Chunxiao Wu, Qingqing Wang, Shuang Yan, Weiqin Yao, Xiaolan Shi, Jingjing Shang, Lingzhi Yan, Ying Yao and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The numerous facets of 1q21Oncology letters · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongying YouNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Song JinNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chunxiao WuNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Qingqing WangNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Shuang YanNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Weiqin YaoNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiaolan ShiNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jingjing ShangNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Lingzhi YanNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Ying YaoHematology Department, Suzhou Hongci Hematology Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Jing WangHematology Department, Suzhou Hongci Hematology Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Panfeng WangHematology Department, Suzhou Hongci Hematology Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Jinlan PanNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Depei WuNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chengcheng FuNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: 1q21 gain/amplification (1q21+) is a common abnormal karyotype in multiple myeloma, and its proportion in Chinese patients is much higher. If 1q21+ is included as one of the poor prognostic factors, it will greatly increase the proportion of high-risk patients in newly diagnosed multiple myelome (NDMM) patients. Therefore, the poor prognostic significance of 1q21+ is still controversial. This study mainly analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment response and prognostic significance of 1q21+ in NDMM patients. Methods: 248 NDMM patients admitted in The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from September 01, 2018 to August 31, 2021 of a VRD registration study, were retrospectively analyzed. 135 cases (54.4%) had 1q21+ by CD38-sorted fluorescence Results: Compared with negative patients, 1q21+ patients were more likely to have anemia, hypoalbuminemia, renal insufficiency, high lactate dehydrogenase and high proportion of R-ISS-III stage. The patients with 1q21+ involving CKS1B detected by Cytoscan had a higher proportion of complex karyotypes and abnormal CNVs, and all at middle-risk or high-risk groups defined by Prognostic Index. Multivariate analysis showed that 1q21+ was an independent adverse prognostic factor (PFS HR=2.358, 95%CI 1.286-4.324, P=0.006; OS HR=2.598, 95%CI 1.050-6.425, P=0.039). 1q21+ subgroup had an inferior outcome (PFS P=0.0133, OS P=0.0293). Furthermore 1q21 amplification had a shorter PFS than 1q21 gain (24 months vs not reached, P=0.0403), but the OS difference was not clinically significant. The proportion of 1q had no effects on prognosis. In addition, 1q21+ in main clone rather than subclone was an adverse factor affecting the prognosis (PFS P=0.0172, OS P=0.1260). Autologous stem cell transplantation can effectively improve the survival of 1q21+ patients (P<0.05). Conclusion: Patients with 1q21+ have clinically significant end-stage organ damage and higher tumor burden, more likely to combine 13q14-, t(4;14), 1p32- and other cytogenetic abnormalities. 1q21+ is an independent high-risk cytogenetic factor for poor prognosis in NDMM patients, of which 4 or more copy numbers and main clone position significantly associated with prognosis results.

Indexed as

1q21 gain/amplificationCytoScanfluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)multiple myelomaprognostic analysis

Identifiers

PMID36276097
PMCPMC9585234
OpenAlexW4303043646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.