ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Preparation of ultrasound contrast agents: The exploration of the structure-echogenicity relationship of contrast agents based on neural network model.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need to standardize the process of micro/nanobubble preparation to bring it closer to clinical translation. We explored a neural network-based model to predict the structure-echogenicity relationship for the preparation and fabrication of ultrasound-enhanced contrast agents. Seven formulations were screened, and 109 measurements were obtained. An artificial neural network-multilayer perceptron (ANN-MLP) model was used. The original data were divided into the training and testing groups, which included 73 and 36 groups of data, respectively. The hidden layer was selected from three hidden layers and included bias. The classification graph showed that the predicted values of the training and testing groups were 76.7% and 66.7%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the accuracy of different imaging effects could achieve a prediction rate of 88.1-96.5%. The percentage graph showed that the data were gradually converging. The predictive analysis curves of different ultrasound effects gradually approached stable value of Gain. Normalized importance predicted contributions for the Pk1, poly-dispersity index (PDI), and intensity account were 100%, 98.5%, and 89.7%, respectively. The application of the ANN-MLP model is feasible and effective for the exploration of the synthesis process of ultrasound contrast agents. 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3 phosphoethanolamine-N (methoxy[polyethylene glycol]-2000) (DSPE PEG-2000) correlated highly with the success rate of contrast agent synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.