Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36276063›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Application of systemic treatment in conversion therapy options for liver cancer.

Haoyang Bei, Weiheng Mai, Weifeng Chen, Mingyi Li, Yongguang Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haoyang BeiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Weiheng MaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Weifeng ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Mingyi LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Yongguang YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Guangdong Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical hepatectomy is the main treatment method to improve the prognosis of patients with intermediate and early-stage liver cancer. Most liver cancer patients in China are in the advanced stage at the initial diagnosis, losing the opportunity for surgical treatment. Therefore, it is essential to down-stage unresectable liver cancer to resectable liver cancer clinically, which is an important way to improve patients' survival and a hotspot of current clinical research. In recent years, with the increase in effective treatment methods for liver cancer, the resection rate of conversion surgery for unresectable advanced liver cancer has been significantly improved, and a growing number of patients benefit from conversion therapy. This article mainly reviews the connotation of conversion therapy for liver cancer, the patient selection, the selection of conversion strategy, the timing of sequential operations, the scheme and safety, etc.

Indexed as

conversion therapydownstagingprimary liver cancersurgical resectionsystemic treatment

Identifiers

PMID36276063
PMCPMC9583895
OpenAlexW4303184126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.