Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36275876›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2022

nnU-Net Deep Learning Method for Segmenting Parenchyma and Determining Liver Volume From Computed Tomography Images.

Rowland W Pettit, Britton B Marlatt, Stuart J Corr, Jim Havelka, Abbas Rana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Osegnet-F-Unext: O-Segnet-Fusion-Unext for pulmonary lobe segmentation of Covid-19 using Computed Tomography image.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rowland W PettitDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Britton B MarlattInformAI, Houston, TX.
Stuart J CorrDepartment of Innovation Systems Engineering, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX.
Jim HavelkaInformAI, Houston, TX.
Abbas RanaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Funding

Training in Precision Environmental Health SciencesT32ES027801 · NIEHS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Cheryl L. Walker · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES027801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recipient donor matching in liver transplantation can require precise estimations of liver volume. Currently utilized demographic-based organ volume estimates are imprecise and nonspecific. Manual image organ annotation from medical imaging is effective; however, this process is cumbersome, often taking an undesirable length of time to complete. Additionally, manual organ segmentation and volume measurement incurs additional direct costs to payers for either a clinician or trained technician to complete. Deep learning-based image automatic segmentation tools are well positioned to address this clinical need. Objectives: To build a deep learning model that could accurately estimate liver volumes and create 3D organ renderings from computed tomography (CT) medical images. Methods: We trained a nnU-Net deep learning model to identify liver borders in images of the abdominal cavity. We used 151 publicly available CT scans. For each CT scan, a board-certified radiologist annotated the liver margins (ground truth annotations). We split our image dataset into training, validation, and test sets. We trained our nnU-Net model on these data to identify liver borders in 3D voxels and integrated these to reconstruct a total organ volume estimate. Results: The nnU-Net model accurately identified the border of the liver with a mean overlap accuracy of 97.5% compared with ground truth annotations. Our calculated volume estimates achieved a mean percent error of 1.92% + 1.54% on the test set. Conclusions: Precise volume estimation of livers from CT scans is accurate using a nnU-Net deep learning architecture. Appropriately deployed, a nnU-Net algorithm is accurate and quick, making it suitable for incorporation into the pretransplant clinical decision-making workflow.

Indexed as

computed tomographydeep learninglivermachine learningnnunetsegmentationsolid organ transplantationtransplantationvolume

Identifiers

PMID36275876
PMCPMC9585534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.